Vitiligo

Is the PALLAS laser as effective as the excimer laser?

In clinical trials, the 311nm PALLAS showed a level of repigmentation for vitiligo equivalent to that of the 308nm excimer laser. However, the two devices differ in actual treatment methods such as wavelength, energy settings, and beam size.

Is the PALLAS laser as effective as the excimer laser?

Yes. In a clinical trial directly comparing the two lasers, the PALLAS laser showed treatment efficacy not inferior to that of the excimer laser.

The research team selected 74 pairs of symmetrical lesions from 21 vitiligo patients and treated one side with a 308nm excimer laser and the opposite side with a 311nm PALLAS laser twice a week for 12 weeks. Both sides were treated in combination with Protopic ointment.

Because the left and right lesions of the same patient were compared, this method could reduce differences in treatment response between individuals.

The average repigmentation rate after 12 weeks was as follows.

CategoryExcimer laserPALLAS laser
Overall repigmentation rate55.4%58.2%
Patients who completed treatment64.7%66.9%
75% or more repigmentation on the face60%65%

The effects of the two treatments were similar, confirming that the PALLAS laser is not inferior to the existing treatment.

In particular, on the face, 65% of the PALLAS laser group showed 75% or more repigmentation, a result comparable to the 60% in the excimer laser group.

On the other hand, on the hands, neither laser showed significant repigmentation. This is related to the characteristic that the hands themselves are a difficult area for vitiligo treatment response, rather than a difference in the devices.

There was also no significant difference in safety. Some patients experienced erythema lasting more than 48 hours or blisters, but the frequency was similar in both groups, and there were no adverse reactions severe enough to require discontinuation of treatment.


How Is PALLAS Different from the Conventional Excimer Laser?

The biggest difference is the wavelength and the method of generating the laser.

The existing excimer laser uses gas as a medium to emit 308nm ultraviolet light, whereas the PALLAS laser uses a titanium-sapphire solid crystal to produce a 311nm wavelength.

CategoryExcimer laserPALLAS laser
Wavelength308nm311nm
MediumGasTitanium-sapphire solid
Treatment methodTargeted irradiation of lesionsTargeted irradiation of lesions
Beam size20×20mm12×12mm
Gas refillRequiredNot required

Like the excimer laser, the PALLAS also allows targeted treatment that selectively irradiates ultraviolet light only to vitiligo lesions.

Unlike whole-body phototherapy, it can reduce unnecessary ultraviolet exposure to normal skin, making it useful for patients with limited lesion areas or for sensitive areas like the face where pigment changes are a concern.

Another advantage of targeted laser treatment is that it can be used for pediatric patients who have difficulty entering a phototherapy unit.


How Was the Effectiveness of PALLAS First Confirmed?

After confirming biological effects in animal experiments, actual repigmentation was confirmed in a preliminary clinical study involving 14 vitiligo patients.

First, in animal experiments, after irradiating with the PALLAS laser, it was confirmed whether the expression of substances involved in the differentiation, proliferation, and migration of melanocytes, such as endothelin-1, stem cell factor, and WNT7a, increased.

As a result, the 311nm laser showed biological responses similar to those of the excimer laser.

Subsequently, 14 patients with vitiligo on the face and neck were treated twice a week with the PALLAS laser in combination with Protopic ointment.

The median number of treatment sessions was 23, and the median treatment duration was approximately 3.7 months.

On average, repigmentation began to appear after about 5 treatment sessions, and ultimately, 11 out of 14 patients (79%) showed 75% or more repigmentation. Among them, 3 patients showed complete repigmentation.

The pattern of repigmentation was also similar to that observed with the existing excimer laser, such as spreading out in spots from around hair follicles or filling in from the edges of the lesion inward.


If the Effects Are Similar, Why Are the Energy Settings Different?

The PALLAS laser requires higher energy to produce the same skin response compared to the excimer laser.

The minimal erythema dose (MED) of the PALLAS laser was approximately 1.7 times higher than that of the excimer laser.

This difference is due to the different wavelengths and photobiological characteristics of the two devices and does not mean that the treatment efficacy of the PALLAS is inferior.

In actual facial treatment, the excimer laser is started at approximately 150 mJ/cm², and the PALLAS laser at approximately 200 mJ/cm².

Afterward, both devices adjust the energy in increments of 50 mJ/cm², aiming for a level where mild erythema is maintained for about 24 to 48 hours after treatment.

Simply comparing the displayed energy numbers should not be used to judge which device is stronger or weaker.

Additionally, the beam size of the PALLAS laser is 12×12 mm, which is smaller than the 20×20 mm of the excimer laser. Therefore, irradiation time may be slightly longer for larger lesions.

On the other hand, because it is a solid-state laser, it does not require periodic gas refills like the excimer laser.


Which Laser Should You Choose: PALLAS or Excimer?

In terms of vitiligo treatment efficacy alone, both devices can be considered validated options.

Clinical studies have shown that the PALLAS laser provides a level of repigmentation comparable to that of the existing excimer laser, with no significant difference in safety.

Like the excimer laser, the PALLAS laser is also eligible for health insurance coverage for vitiligo treatment, so there is no significant difference in the cost borne by the patient.

Rather, what has a greater impact on actual treatment outcomes is the area where vitiligo occurs and each patient's treatment response, not the name of the device.

This is not due to differences in device performance, but because the distribution and characteristics of melanocytes vary by area. Even on the same face, treatment response may differ between the area around the eyes and the lips. While the face may recover well, both devices may have difficulty treating the hands.


References

  • Bae JM, Lee JH, Jung YS, Kim GM. The efficacy of a gain-switched 311-nm Titanium laser in the treatment of vitiligo: A pilot study of 14 patients. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:1055–1056

  • Bae JM, Eun SH, Lee HN, Kim GM, Grimes PE, Lee JH. Comparison of 311-nm Titanium laser and 308-nm excimer laser treatment for vitiligo: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51:239–244

  • Bae JM, Hann SK. Laser treatments for vitiligo. Med Laser. 2016;5:63–70

Jung Min Bae

Dermatologist · Gangnam Branch

With sincere care and continuous research, I will be a reliable companion for vitiligo patients.